2015-03-21

Eerola, 2003: Statistics of the arrival times of conventional observations for HIRLAM at FMI

NWP systems wait for observation data coming in a little amount of time after the time of observation.  It is called cut-off time because the data coming after the time is virtually discarded as if it's on a cut wire of telegraph.  How long should we wait is a question.  The WMO Manual on GDPFS says the target of reporting is 3 hours after the observation time.  How is the reality?

I found an article in HIRLAM newsletter:
Eerola, 2003: Statistics of the arrival times of conventional observations for HIRLAM at FMI
http://hirlam.org/index.php/component/docman/doc_view/634-hirlam-newsletter-no-44-article06-kalle-eerola?Itemid=70

The finding is
  • Two hours is almost complete data for surface, aircraft and satob
  • Upper-air observation namely TEMP and PILOT comes slower, and three hours needed for complete set
FMI seems to have shorten the cut-off from 2.5 hours to probably two hours.  Three hours wait was considered way too much even with the additional upper-air data is taken into account. 

One thing to note is the study was for european regional model, and may be a bit different in global model.

No comments :

Post a Comment